Great Bear Magmatic Zone, North West Territories, CanadaThis zone has also been referred to as the Great Bear Magnetic zone. It includes many areas of brecciation with high magnetite contents.
Of the 19 seperate samples supplied, 8 were split into both magnetic and non-magnetic fractions, resulting in 27 seperate analyses. Only samples from NICO were described as ore, so these were used as a basis for comparison with other samples to try to identify similarites and other potential ore areas.
The NICO Ore samples NICO-96-4 and BOWL-96-4 show a common
peak at 610 C. For the BOWL sample this peak is present on both the
and non-magnetic separates. Sample N21 lacked any useable
(is BOWL-96-4 a deeper sample from the same drillhole as NICO-96-4???)
Surface sample DBX-5 shows the same 610 C peak similar to the ore
but Surface sample NBX-10 has a peak at 550 C and is distinct from the
The Peanut Lake samples, despite being from the "NICO horizon" are
different with intense, skewed decrepitation peaks at 700 C on magnetic
Sue-Dianne has 4 samples from the same drillhole, but the results
markedly and no sequence with depth is recognizeable. Only sample ZP-30
with a peak at 620 C seems similar to the NICO ore samples. Sample
magnetics, has a very narrow peak which is assumed to be due to
and the sample is excluded from interpretation. However, as noted
I did examine this sample under reflected light at *100 magnigication
saw no sulphide. I would be interested to know the precise mineralogy
Hump Lake north and Islands samples again show differeing decrepitation responses, however HPN-1 magnetics has a peak at 600 C, comparable with the NICO ore samples.
RON, MAR SPW and STEW are assumed to be distal/ barren samples and are each quite distinct. SPW1 with a peak at 610 C has similarities with the NICO ore, while RON, MAR2 and STEW show a higher decrepitation temperature from 660 C and up.
P-HM-3 has a distinct quartz type response (alpha-beta inversion
at 580 C), with only an indistinct FeOx contribution and is excluded
SummaryOverall, the decrepitation intensity on these samples is unusually low, compared with the usually intense decrepitation on samples from Tennant Creek (NT), Upper Beaver (Ont.) and the Lyon and Kingston skarn deposits (Nv., Ca.). A decrepitaion peak at 610 C is seen on a number of samples and seems to be the most common feature in these samples.
|LOCATION||Sample #||Peak temperature C|
|Hump Lake||1||600, 770|
|Hump Lake Islands||470, 800|
Comparison with other magnetites
H1176, H1177, H1179: Humbolt - Nevada, near Winnemucca, collected on
tour with Mark Barton, unmineralised old Fe mine
H1345: Kingston summit - Nv/Ca border down near death valley - field trip with Mark Barton, Skarn magnetite, not thought to be sulphide mineralised, little known
H378: Lyon skarn magnetite, Near Yerrington, Nv. Low Cu/Au values in magntite skarn.
H1346, Mountain Pass carbonantite; feldspar-magnetite ,
H1310: Agrium - Carbonatite magnetite near Kapuskasing, Ont. Mined for Phosphate now.
F216, F796: Tennant Creek, NT aust. Warrego was a VERY rich CU/AU mine, magnetite, chlorite, haematite host - no quartz.
f1202: Nobles Nob, Tennant Creek, NT, rich Au mine, like warrego, but haematite dominant rather than magnetite.
H178: Upper Beaver, Timmins district, Ont. AU mine in magnetite host, several shafts, not operational when sampled in 1993.
G1997: Afton BC, magnetite skarn in porphry Cu belt of BC. (pink)
Magnetites show lots of interesting decrepitation patterns, but its
hard to be sure what these mean as, unlike quartz, no-one has
data on fluid inclusions in magnetite. Note, some people do not think
acoustic events are caused by fluid inclusions (acoustic emission has
suggested) but I think fluid inclusions are the probable cause of the