Applied Mineral Exploration
Discussion and research relevant to mineral
exploration. |
Home |
Rapid fluid inclusion data
for exploration (decrepitation) |
Newest Topics |
Viewpoints
|
Bicycles |
Of the 19 seperate samples supplied, 8 were split into both magnetic and non-magnetic fractions, resulting in 27 seperate analyses. Only samples from NICO were described as ore, so these were used as a basis for comparison with other samples to try to identify similarites and other potential ore areas.
The NICO Ore samples NICO-96-4 and BOWL-96-4 show a common
decrepitation
peak at 610 C. For the BOWL sample this peak is present on both the
magnetic
and non-magnetic separates. Sample N21 lacked any useable
decrepitation.
(is BOWL-96-4 a deeper sample from the same drillhole as NICO-96-4???)
Surface sample DBX-5 shows the same 610 C peak similar to the ore
samples,
but Surface sample NBX-10 has a peak at 550 C and is distinct from the
others.
The Peanut Lake samples, despite being from the "NICO horizon" are
quite
different with intense, skewed decrepitation peaks at 700 C on magnetic
fractions.
Sue-Dianne has 4 samples from the same drillhole, but the results
differ
markedly and no sequence with depth is recognizeable. Only sample ZP-30
with a peak at 620 C seems similar to the NICO ore samples. Sample
ZP46,
magnetics, has a very narrow peak which is assumed to be due to
sulphides
and the sample is excluded from interpretation. However, as noted
previously
I did examine this sample under reflected light at *100 magnigication
and
saw no sulphide. I would be interested to know the precise mineralogy
of
this sample.
Hump Lake north and Islands samples again show differeing decrepitation responses, however HPN-1 magnetics has a peak at 600 C, comparable with the NICO ore samples.
RON, MAR SPW and STEW are assumed to be distal/ barren samples and are each quite distinct. SPW1 with a peak at 610 C has similarities with the NICO ore, while RON, MAR2 and STEW show a higher decrepitation temperature from 660 C and up.
P-HM-3 has a distinct quartz type response (alpha-beta inversion
peak
at 580 C), with only an indistinct FeOx contribution and is excluded
from
interpretation.
| LOCATION | Sample # | Peak temperature C |
| ------------ | ------ | ------------ |
| NICO | DBX5 | 610 |
| NBX10 | 550 | |
| 96-4 | 610, 790 | |
| BOWL | 96-4 | 610 |
| N-21 | x | |
| Paenut Lake | 1 | 700 |
| 2 | 500, 640 | |
| Sue-Dianne | ZP46 | 470 (S=??) |
| ZP30 | 620 | |
| ZP32 | 530, 740 | |
| ZP17 | 650 | |
| RON | 730 | |
| MAR | 2 | 660 |
| SPW | 1 | 610 |
| STEW | 690 | |
| Hump Lake | 1 | 600, 770 |
| 2 | 500, 640 | |
| Hump Lake Islands | 470, 800 | |
| Crystal Mountain | x |
H1176, H1177, H1179: Humbolt - Nevada, near Winnemucca, collected on
tour with Mark Barton, unmineralised old Fe mine
H1345: Kingston summit - Nv/Ca border down near death valley - field
trip with Mark Barton, Skarn magnetite, not thought to be sulphide
mineralised,
little known
H378: Lyon skarn magnetite, Near Yerrington, Nv. Low Cu/Au values in
magntite skarn.
H1346, Mountain Pass carbonantite; feldspar-magnetite ,
magnetic
component
H1310: Agrium - Carbonatite magnetite near Kapuskasing, Ont. Mined
for Phosphate now.
F216, F796: Tennant Creek, NT aust. Warrego was a VERY rich CU/AU mine,
magnetite, chlorite, haematite host - no quartz.
f1202: Nobles Nob, Tennant Creek, NT, rich Au mine, like warrego, but
haematite dominant rather than magnetite.
H178: Upper Beaver, Timmins district, Ont. AU mine in magnetite host,
several shafts, not operational when sampled in 1993.
G1997: Afton BC, magnetite skarn in porphry Cu belt of BC. (pink)
Magnetites show lots of interesting decrepitation patterns, but its
hard to be sure what these mean as, unlike quartz, no-one has
documented
data on fluid inclusions in magnetite. Note, some people do not think
the
acoustic events are caused by fluid inclusions (acoustic emission has
been
suggested) but I think fluid inclusions are the probable cause of the
observed
decrepitation events.