Applied mineral exploration methods, hydrothermal fluids, baro-acoustic decrepitation, CO2 rich fluids
Viewpoints:

Thermodynamics shows Au is insoluble in CO2 fluids

Do IOCG deposits form from CO2 rich fluids?

Inclusion shapes can prove heterogeneous trapping

Disproportional FI trapping from heterogeneous fluids explains gas-dominant systems

A discussion of H2 analysis by mass spectrometry

A mechanism to form H2 in the MS ioniser during analyses

Why don't Exploration geologists understand fluid inclusions?

News:

New model 205 decreptiometer

Studies of 6 Pegmatite deposits

A study of the Gejiu tin mine, China

Data on MVT Pb-Zn deposits, Tunisia

Data from Hall and Mt Hope Mo, Nevada

A magnetite study - Bergslagen region, Sweden

Exploration using palaeo-hydrothermal fluids

Using opaque minerals to understand ore fluids

Decrepitation using Fe-oxide opaques

Understanding baro-acoustic decrepitation.

An introduction to fluid inclusions and mineral exploration applications.



 Interesting Conferences:


Futores II, June 4-7, Townsville, Australia

ECROFI 2017, June 23-29, Nancy, France

AOGS 14th, Aug 6-11, Singapore

SGA 2017, Aug. 20-23, Quebec city, Canada

SEG 2017, Sept. 17-20, Beijing, China

Exploration 17, Oct. 21-25, Toronto, Canada

AAG 2017 at RFG2018, June 16-21 2018, Vancouver, Canada


Comprehensive Geology Conference Calendar


An explanation of the baro-acoustic decrepitation method

Presented by K. Burlinson at the ACROFI-2 conference, Kharagpur, India, 2008

title page

The Acoustic decrepitation method was first used in Canada in the late 1940's. As microthermometric methods improved, the decrepitation method lost favour because the microthermometric results were more precise. However, the decrepitation method was not well understood at this time because the thermodynamics of fluids in inclusions was not known and, critically, there was little or no understanding of the importance of CO2 rich fluids within mineralising hydrothermal fluid systems. With our better current understanding of hydrothermal fluids and thermodynamics, it is now apparent that the baro-acoustic decrepitation method is very useful as a mineral exploration method. Despite being a little less accurate, decrepitation can provide rapid and cheap analyses on large numbers of samples much more easily than using microthermometric methods and provides fluid information which is very useful during mineral exploration.

The acoustic decrepitation analysis procedure does not require the preparation of a thin section or use of a microscope and consists of these steps:
No microscope work is required!

In mineral exploration, the understanding of the CO2 content of hydrothermal fluids is very useful to locate economically interesting targets. The decrepitation method is a rapid way to measure the CO2 contents of samples.
To explain the low temperature decrepitation of gas rich fluid inclusions, consider this PT diagram
decrepitation PT plot

Consider 2 fluid inclusions formed at 380 C and 1 Kbar pressure (the Formation point on this graph), one inclusion being pure CO2 and the other pure H2O.
After cooling to room temperature the CO2 inclusion will retain a high internal pressure and when heated it will rapidly develop a high internal pressure and decrepitate at about 160 C. Its P-T path is along the magenta line, which is determined by the gas law of thermodynamics.
The H2O inclusion, when cooled to room temperature, will consist of a liquid with a vapour bubble at negligible internal pressure and will not develop much internal pressure until it is heated above the Homogenisation point (310 C in this example). It will not develop enough internal pressure to cause decrepitation (about 500 bars) until about 340 C, the decrepitation point of aqueous inclusions. Its P-T path is along the blue "vapour-liquid curve for water" and then along the green isochore after homogenisation.

So despite forming at the same pressure and temperature, the CO2 inclusions will decrepitate at much lower temperature than equivalent aqueous inclusions and this behaviour means that acoustic decrepitation can be used to determine the presence of CO2 rich fluids.

Mixtures of CO2 and H2O are immiscible at low temperatures and will separate into 2 component phases. The gas phase will dominate the internal pressure of the inclusions and gas-water mixtures will behave much like gas rich inclusions but with lower fluid density.

PTX plot


Fluid inclusions containing gas - water mixtures decrepitate much like gas rich fluid inclusions.

co2-water mixture pt

Because the P-T behaviour of gases is given by the gas law and is independent of the gas molecule species, decrepitation is similar for all gases.
These P-T plots are calculated from the equation of state formulae for 3 common constituent gases in fluid inclusions.

differnet gases behave the same

The decrepitation of fluid inclusions is dependent upon the size and morphology of the inclusions and very small inclusions probably do not decrepitate.

size effects on decrepitation

Mass spectrometer analyses of gases released during thermal decrepitation show large amounts of CH4 and CO2 released at low temperature, corresponding with the low temperature baro-acoustic decrepitation peak.

mass spec on released gases

The decrepitation counts are only caused by pressure pulses as fluid inclusions burst open and are not caused by crystallographic effects, as shown by the absence of decrepitation on a sample which is heated for a second time. There is no response at the quartz alpha-beta phase transition temperature of 573 C in the reheated sample despite the fact that this phase change cannot be quenched.

quartz and rerun

Decrepitation counts occur at the quartz phase transition temperature in fresh samples because the strength of quartz, as measured by its Young's modulus, decreases dramatically at the phase transition temperature and this allows small inclusions to decrepitate because of the weakening of the quartz host mineral. Parallel and perpendicular refer to the direction of measurements relative to the c axis of the quartz.

youns modulus of qtz with temperature

Two different instruments have been used to analyse the same quartz standard sample and both instruments give the same analytical result.

The upper instrument in this picture is the BGS model 105 decrepitometer as used in Darwin. The lower instrument is operated by professor Xieyihan in Beijing.
The instruments are electronically completely different. The BGS instrument is completely digital and is operated by an attached computer (not shown), while the Beijing instrument used entirely analogue electronics.

both instruments


Both instruments give the same result on the standard sample despite their vastly different electronics and 2 different instrument operators.


results comparison



Regular re-analyses of the calibration standard sample shows that the instrument reproducibility over time is good.

reproducibility

The instrument ONLY detects PRESSURE changes.


soundpath

Updated Understanding:

Inclusion Abundance Measurements


To investigate the proportion of inclusions which decrepitate during heating, inclusion counts were carried out on thin sections of several samples for comparison with the decrepitation curves from the same samples.

Sample PCE15

pce15 counts


The counts and decrepitation for this sample are:
(interval counts in red: cumulative counts in green)
pce15 cumulateive counts

Just less than 1% of the observed inclusions > 8 microns were detected during decrepitation.


Sample PCE3


pce3 counts




The counts and decrepiation for this sample are:
(interval counts in red: cumulative counts in green)
pce3 cum counts

Only 0.4% of the inclusions > 8 microns were detected during decrepitation.



Sample PCB4



pcb4 microphoto



The counts and decrepiation for this sample are:
(interval counts in red: cumulative counts in green)
pcb4  cum counts

Only 0.5% of the inclusions > 10 microns were detected during decrepitation.

Most fluid inclusions do not decrepitate and quartz can apparently withstand fluid inclusion with internal pressures of several kilobars.

Although the decrepitation method detects only a small proportion of the total number of inclusions in a samples, the results are consistently reproducible on multiple analyses of the same sample. And decrepiation still detects and counts a vastly greater number of inclusions per sample than is ever achieved during microthermometric studies, so the decrepitation data is far more statistically robust.

In addition to the effect of inclusion size  upon decrepitation, the stress regime in the host mineral will control which inclusions are able to decrepitate. These comparison photographs of the same sample are before and after thermal cycling shows that an inclusion close to a plane of weakness in the host mineral has decrepitated, but nearby larger inclusions have not decrepitated because they were distant from a plane of weakness in the quartz host mineral.

dec and undec sample



Conclusions:



Why use baro-acoustic decrepitation?  Because it is the most appropriate fluid inclusion technique for use in mineral exploration.


Different procedures are appropriate for different outcomes. Microthermometry is appropriate for mineral deposit genesis study, but too slow and cumbersome for mineral exploration. Baro-acoustic decrepitation gives rapid and reliable data with quick sample turn-around and is the preferred method to apply fluid inclusion measurements to mineral exploration programmes.

outcomes


Back to main contents

Home